Repeated bogus claims of Russian hacking by a disingenuous “security” firm with shadowy ties to Washington’s propaganda machine – including the Department of Homeland Security and the highly politicized office of the Director of National Intelligence, both of which constantly hype terrorism with no supporting evidence while perpetually fueling it – do not make bogus claims true and offer more insight into why you should question them. As more leaked evidence eviscerating Hillary and showing her true colors and disregard for ‘everyday Americans’ appears, the lies and desperation to keep her culture of corruption covered up will grow.
In typical fashion Washington’s Chief propaganda pushers – The New York Times and The Washington Post – repeated the bogus Russian hacking claims as gospel. Ironically, while pushing Washington’s lies without questions both publications periodically publish pertinent articles delving into the content of the emails and the damage they do to Clinton. It’s obvious that the release of damning revelations about Clinton were timed to try and interfere with the U.S. election process but it’s completely unclear of how the hacks could be attributed to the authorization of only Russia’s senior-most officials when no evidence supporting those claims is presented for review.
For those who may have missed it: Senator Bernie Sanders’ supporters suspicions that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) colluded with Hillary Clinton to make her — the corrupt establishment favorite — the official Democratic Presidential nominee were confirmed recently when WikiLeaks, the whistleblower site, published nearly 20,000 emails and documents attributed to a hack by Guccifer 2.0, though the Clinton campaign dubiously attributed it to Russia, that revealed their suspicions were correct.
WikiLeaks released 19,252 emails and 8,034 attachments covering the period from January last year until May 25 this year from seven key figures of the DNC: Communications Director Luis Miranda (10770 emails), National Finance Director Jordon Kaplan (3797 emails), Finance Chief of Staff Scott Comer (3095 emails), Finance Director of Data & Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish (1472 emails), Finance Director Allen Zachary (1611 emails), Senior Advisor Andrew Wright (938 emails) and Northern California Finance Director Robert (Erik) Stowe (751 emails).
Some of the emails show the DNC as using “us” language when referring to Clinton supporters while using “them” language when referring to Sanders supporters. All the leaked documents reveal that the DNC secretly worked behind the scenes to help ensure Clinton took the primary and not Sanders.
Even Debbie Wasserman Schultz, DNC chairwoman appointed by Hillary Clinton — who also used a private email for DNC business — was involved in the chicanery despite lying from the beginning. Wasserman Schultz wrote in one email that Sanders would never be president despite denying that any manipulations by the DNC were happening. In fact it appears that Clinton’s DNC chairwoman was involved in more than one email incident aimed at eviscerating Bernie Sanders.